Now, some background. From the very start we 
thought it was important to be really ‘open source’. What does it mean 
and how is it different?
The problem is the term is severely abused. You 
can see a lot of companies (including social software) putting ‘open 
source’ tag on their work but actually using it as a marketing ploy. 
Some of them go as low as encrypting/obfuscating source code to prevent 
easy removal of references and selling “licenses” to remove those 
extended backlinks, clearly created to annoy site owners.
And the “business model” seems to work. A lot of 
people think they need to make an impression that they build their 
websites themselves. C’mon guys, if governments use open source software
 for their websites, do you think it’s a shame to acknowledge you do the
 same practical and honorable thing? I can smell the anti-competition 
rationale here but people should understand that software has nothing to
 do with the ability to run communities. There must be a reason why 
Facebook still haven’t been eaten by “competition”?
People falling for this meme enable 
pseudo-opensource companies do what they do. However we believe this is 
not what open source stands for and not how it should make money to 
support development. 
It is not accidental that we use CPAL license.
 It’s less restrictive than GPL, for example, because it doesn’t make 
you release any derivative works under the same license. With CPAL you 
can keep your version closed, include it in larger works, sell your own 
distributions, fork and relicense, whatever.
We don’t want to restrict your benefits from our 
work, nor do we want to impose hidden costs on you via marketing tricks.
 It’s just that we give you results of our hard work for multiple years 
in exchange for you helping us spread the word. 
Oxwall reference is small, unobtrusive and 
designed to not make you want to remove it. It is one of a few ways to 
promote free software. If you got a lot from Oxwall and feel like giving
 back, please help us with that. 
Although we reserve the right to let somebody 
rightfully remove the required reference, the reasoning shouldn’t sound 
like “hi, I want to remove your link because… I don’t like it there”.
Thanks for creating with us!
 
No comments:
Post a Comment